Hence, the Golden Rule of "do unto others" is "dangerous in the wrong hands,"  according to philosopher Iain Kingbecause "some fanatics have no aversion to death: The difference is this.
This is not what the Kantian Principle would support. In this way, the golden rule may be self-correcting. Thus the "golden rule" might still express the essence of a universal morality even if no two men in the world had any needs or tastes in common.
It follows that we should not do so ourselves—according to the golden rule. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn it. Why should willingness to be on the receiving end of like action make it permissible? Love your neighbor as yourself: Nothing could be further from the truth.
Bornsteinand William E. To see this, consider the following somewhat salacious example. This is my command unto thee, do thou observe it.
Their tastes may be different. Paden, the Golden Rule is arguably the most essential basis for the modern concept of human rightsin which each individual has a right to just treatment, and a reciprocal responsibility to ensure justice for others.
Their tastes may be different" is no doubt a smart saying. You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. How does one know how others want to be treated? The development of human "rights" is a modern political ideal that began as a philosophical concept promulgated through the philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau in 18th century France, among others.
The obvious way is to ask them, but this cannot be done if one assumes they have not reached a particular and relevant understanding. Damrosch argued that to confuse the Golden Rule with human rights is to apply contemporary thinking to ancient concepts.
This principle of "doing unto others, wherever possible, as they would be done by Human rights[ edit ] According to Marc H. With the Golden rule a masochist or a sadist would be justified in causing or receiving pain.
The most serious among these is its application. In evolution, " reciprocal altruism " is seen as a distinctive advance in the capacity of human groups to survive and reproduce, as their exceptional brains demanded exceptionally long childhoods and ongoing provision and protection even beyond that of the immediate family.
Differences in values or interests[ edit ] George Bernard Shaw wrote, "Do not do unto others as you would that they should do unto you. Cannot be a sole guide to action[ edit ] In his book How to Make Good Decisions and Be Right All the Timephilosopher Iain King has argued that " although the idea of mirroring your treatment of others with their treatment of you is very widespread indeed… most ancient wisdoms express this negatively — advice on what you should not do, rather than what you should.
More generally, can acceptance of being on the receiving end of like action legitimate anything? In his book on the golden rule, Jeffrey Wattles makes the similar observation that such objections typically arise while applying the golden rule in certain general ways namely, ignoring differences in taste, in situation, and so forth.
Here are just some examples. Psychologically, it involves a person empathizing with others. The Golden Rule, as Kant well knew, is a deeply misguided ethical principle. Act according to the maxim that you would wish all other rational people to follow, as if it were a universal law.
We would often want other people to ignore any prejudice against our race or nationality when deciding how to act towards us, but would also want them to not ignore our differing preferences in food, desire for aggressiveness, and so on.
The Horny Martin Example. Philosophically, it involves a person perceiving their neighbor also as "I" or "self". The positive formulation, meanwhile, can be "incendiary",  since it "can lead to cycles of tit-for-tat reciprocity," unless it is accompanied by a corrective mechanism, such as a concept of forgiveness.
The Golden Rule Around the World The same essential golden rule has been taught by all the major religions and philosophies of the world going back approximately years. Act as you would have others act towards you.
Act as you would want all other people to act towards all other people. I am the LORD.4.
THE GOLDEN RULE IN KANT AND UTILITARIANISM DANIEL BERTHOLD BARD COLLEGE From the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt that in the modern period two philosophies stand out as by far the most important in.
examining the foundation of ethics and morality in the two systems, using the Golden rule principle in an African ethics and Kant’s categorical imperative in Western ethics as tools of comparative analysis.
The term "Golden Rule", or "Golden law", Immanuel Kant famously criticized the golden rule for not being sensitive to differences of situation, noting that a prisoner duly convicted of a crime could appeal to the golden rule while asking the judge to release him. Essay on The Golden Rule in Kant and Mill's Ethical Theories; Essay on The Golden Rule in Kant and Mill's Ethical Theories.
The two most important philosophers that deal with ethics are Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. Kant’s ethical theory is Kantianism or deontological ethics. More about Essay on The Golden Rule in Kant and Mill. The categorical imperative vs The 'golden rule' up vote 4 down vote favorite.
According to the IEP, the golden rule: Kant did directly address the Golden Rule at least one point in his philosophy.
If I remember the gist correctly, he's highly critical for one reason: the golden rule depends largely on how you would feel about what was done.
Universal-izability an introduction to the analysis of the golden rule by immanuel kant Introduction This discourse shows how the traditional IV Philosophy Introduction to Kant an introduction to the analysis of the golden rule by immanuel kant By Professor Ralph Barton Perry Lectures on the Harvard Classics .Download