Judith jarvis thomsons defence on abortion essay

And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: Suppose a woman has become pregnant, and now learns that she has a cardiac condition such that she will die if she carries the baby to term. Indeed, in what pregnancy could it be supposed that the mother has given the unborn person such a right?

Abortion term papers Disclaimer: Virgin Islands have child abuse and neglect statutes which provide for the protection of a child who does not receive needed medical care.

Opponents of abortion commonly spend most of their time establishing that the fetus is a person, and hardly anytime explaining the step from there to the impermissibility of abortion. So my own view is that even though you ought to let the violinist use your kidneys for the one hour he needs, we should not conclude that he has a right to do so--we should say that if you refuse, you are, like the boy who owns all the chocolates and will give none away, self-centered and callous, indecent in fact, but not unjust.

They may wish to assume responsibility for it, or they may not wish to. If someone threatens you with death unless you torture someone else to death, I think you have not the right, even to save your Judith jarvis thomsons defence on abortion essay, to do so.

Ronald Munson Belmont; Wadsworth And our attention might be drawn to the fact that men and women both are compelled by law to provide support for their children I have in effect dealt briefly with this argument in section 4 above; but a still briefer recapitulation now may be in order.

It may be simply a failure to appreciate this fact. So here you do what he supposedly has a right you shall not do, but you do not act unjustly to him in doing it.

Abortion/ Response To Judith Jarvis Thomson's

And it might be argued that all my analogies are therefore irrelevant--for you do not have that special kind of responsibility for that violinist; Henry Fonda does not have that special kind of responsibility for me.

If masculine thought is naturally hierarchical and oriented toward power and control, then the interests of the fetus who has no power would naturally be suppressed in favor of the interests of the mother.

My second argument is concerning the end of this essay. Perhaps he was urging people to do more than is morally required of them. Thomson says that some view the right to life as having the right to not be killed by anyone.

Take 2for example. For we should now, at long last, ask what it comes to, to have a right to life. It should be stated that the right to life includes not being killed by anyone unjustly.

Most opposition to abortion relies on the premise that the fetus is a human being, a person, from the moment of conception. It would be less nice, though no doubt well meant, if my friends flew out to the West coast and brought Henry Fonda back with them.

But if this emendation is accepted, the gap in the argument against abortion stares us plainly in the face: This would be similar to the woman who became pregnant as a result of rape. But I would stress that I am not arguing that people do not have a right to life--quite to the contrary, it seems to me that the primary control we must place on the acceptability of an account of rights is that it should turn out in that account to be a truth that all persons have a right to life.

Suppose you find yourself trapped in a tiny house with a growing child. Horan and Burke J. Or perhaps we had better allow that it would have been a Splendid Samaritan who did this, on the ground that it would have involved a risk of death for himself.

We can do what you ask. Consequently, Thomson is mistaken, because she ignores the natural relationship between sexual intercourse and human reproduction, when she claims that if a couple has "taken all reasonable precautions against having a child, they do not by virtue of their biological relationship to the child who comes into existence have a special responsibility for it.

But although they do grant it, I have tried to show that they do not take seriously what is done in granting it.

I suppose that the people I have in mind will say it does follow that the brother has a right to some of the chocolates, and thus that the boy does act unjustly if he refuses to give his brother any. And we should also notice that it is not at all plain that this argument really does go even as far as it purports to.

My own view is that if a human being has any just, prior claim to anything at all, he has a just, prior claim to his own body. If you unplug yourself from him, he will die from his sickness. We are asked to notice that the development of a human being from conception through birth into childhood is continuous; then it is said that to draw a line, to choose a point in this development and say "before this point the thing is not a person, after this point it is a person" is to make an arbitrary choice, a choice for which in the nature of things no good reason can be given.

She has already granted that in some situations it is okay to have an abortion, however, at the end she says that she does not agree with killing the unborn child. But is it even accurate to refer to abortion as the "withholding of support or treatment"?

The Flateaus refused and, although Depue was sick and had fainted, put him out of the house into the cold night.A Defense of Abortion – Judith Jarvis Thomson.

As the title makes plain, Thomson argues that abortion is not impermissible. More precisely, she argues for the conclusion that abortion is sometimes permissible; she grants that there are scenarios in which obtaining an abortion would be immoral.

What is especially novel is the manner in which. Judith Jarvis Thomson however attacks the conclusion ‘it is wrong intentionally to take the life of the unborn’. Thompson challenges the idea that one can argue effectively from this premise to the conclusion, that sometimes abortion is morally permissible.

Disclaimer: Free essays on Abortion posted on this site were donated by anonymous users and are provided for informational use only. The free Abortion research paper (Response To Judith Jarvis Thomson's "A Defense For Abortion" essay) presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing killarney10mile.com you need.

A Defense of Abortion

Free Essay: Judith Jarvis Thomson's defence on abortion Most arguments concerning the abortion issue hinge on the moral status or standing of the fetus with.

Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion. From Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 1, no. 1 Opponents of abortion commonly spend most of their time establishing that the fetus is a person, and hardly anytime explaining the step from there to the impermissibility of abortion.

Perhaps they think the step too simple and obvious to require. "A Defense of Abortion" is a moral philosophy paper by Judith Jarvis Thomson first published in Granting for the sake of argument that the fetus has a right to life, Overview of the essay The violinist.

In "A Defense of Abortion".

Judith jarvis thomsons defence on abortion essay
Rated 3/5 based on 59 review